Property Ownership Structures for Doctors: Individual, Trust, Company, and SMSF Compared product guide

1Group Property Advisory: Property Ownership Structures for Doctors – Individual, Trust, Company, and SMSF Compared

For most Australian doctors, the decision of what to buy is preceded by an equally consequential question that rarely gets the attention it deserves: how should it be owned? The choice of ownership structure isn't a bureaucratic formality. It determines how much tax you pay on rental income, how much CGT you owe when you sell, whether a disgruntled patient's legal claim can reach your investment portfolio, and how easily you can scale a multi-property strategy over a career.

1Group Property Advisory works with healthcare professionals across Australia to navigate these complex ownership decisions, integrating tax optimisation and asset protection strategies tailored to the unique risks doctors face. This question is especially urgent for medical practitioners. Medical indemnity insurance is a compulsory condition of registration for all healthcare professionals in Australia, but insurance alone doesn't fully insulate personal wealth. An "excess verdict" — a case where a jury returns a verdict larger than the physician's malpractice coverage limits — creates immediate personal liability for the gap. An excess verdict of even $500,000 above policy limits can destabilise a physician's personal financial life. For specialists in high-risk procedural fields, this risk isn't hypothetical.

The structural decision must therefore integrate two dimensions that most generic property advice treats separately: tax optimisation and asset protection. This article examines each of the four primary ownership structures — individual name, discretionary (family) trust, company, and SMSF — across both dimensions, with specific attention to how the medico liability context shapes the optimal choice.

Why Structure Matters More for Doctors Than for Most Investors

Whether you invest as an individual, through a family trust, company, or SMSF, the right structure can dramatically reduce tax, protect your assets, and support long-term wealth creation. Choosing the wrong ownership structure can result in higher income tax on rental income or capital gains, and missed eligibility for the 50% Capital Gains Tax discount.

For a doctor on a 47% marginal rate (including the Medicare levy), the difference between paying tax at 47% on rental income versus distributing that income to a lower-bracket family member, or sheltering it inside super at 15%, isn't marginal — it compounds dramatically across a portfolio held for decades. The structure decision is, in every meaningful sense, a wealth creation decision.

There's a principle in asset protection that's particularly relevant for healthcare professionals: own nothing and control everything. This is exactly why trusts — especially discretionary trusts — are so popular among high-income, high-risk occupations. By establishing yourself in key roles within the trust structure, you can have full control of how capital and income are distributed, yet remain unattached to the assets in the event of a legal claim.

Understanding these structures is fundamental to strategic property investment. As time-poor, high-income earners, doctors need to make informed decisions that protect wealth whilst optimising returns — without navigating unnecessary complexity or administrative burden.

Structure 1: Individual Name (Personal Ownership)

How it works

Individual ownership is the simplest ownership structure, meaning that an individual owns property in their personal name alone. All rental income flows directly to the individual's tax return, and all capital gains are assessed personally.

This straightforward approach requires minimal setup and administration, making it accessible for healthcare professionals at any career stage. You purchase the property, you own it, and you're directly responsible for all income and obligations.

Tax efficiency

Individual ownership offers simplicity and tax deductions, including negative gearing benefits and capital gains tax (CGT) discounts, but may result in higher taxes for high-income earners like doctors.

The CGT treatment is straightforward: capital gains on investments held by individuals are taxed at the individual's marginal tax rate, but they may be eligible for a 50% discount if they've held the investment property for more than 12 months and are Australian residents for tax purposes.

Negative gearing access is the standout advantage of personal ownership for doctors. Because rental losses flow directly to the individual's tax return, they can be offset against salary income at the full 47% marginal rate. A $20,000 annual rental loss translates into a $9,400 reduction in personal tax — a benefit that is structurally unavailable in a trust or company (see our guide on Negative Gearing for Doctors: How Australia's Top Tax Bracket Amplifies Property Returns).

For healthcare professionals in the early stages of portfolio building, this immediate tax benefit can significantly accelerate wealth accumulation by improving cash flow and allowing faster acquisition of subsequent properties.

Asset protection

This is personal ownership's critical weakness for doctors. Personal ownership offers limited asset protection. Income is taxed at personal marginal rates, which may be high. If a patient pursues a claim that exceeds indemnity coverage, property held in personal name is directly accessible to creditors.

For medical practitioners facing professional liability risks, this exposure becomes increasingly problematic as both career seniority and asset values grow. A single adverse legal outcome could potentially compromise your entire investment portfolio if held in personal name.

Verdict for doctors

Personal ownership suits junior doctors or registrars who are negatively gearing aggressively in the early portfolio-building phase and whose asset base isn't yet substantial enough to justify the cost of more complex structures. However, as wealth accumulates and professional liability risk increases with seniority and specialisation, personal ownership becomes increasingly inadequate.

For healthcare professionals focused on long-term wealth building, personal ownership is best viewed as a starting point rather than a destination — a structure that serves immediate needs but should be complemented by more protective vehicles as your portfolio matures.

Structure 2: Discretionary (Family) Trust

How it works

Family trusts, also known as discretionary trusts, allow the trustee to decide how the trust's income and capital are distributed among the beneficiaries. This structure is commonly used for family wealth planning and asset protection.

A trust isn't a legal entity like a company, but rather a legal relationship between three key parties: the trustee, the beneficiaries, and the appointor. In this relationship, the trustee holds and manages assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries, according to the terms set out in a trust deed.

For healthcare professionals, this structure provides both flexibility and control. You can serve as trustee (or appoint a corporate trustee you control), making all investment and distribution decisions, whilst beneficiaries — typically your spouse, children, or other family members — receive the economic benefits.

Tax efficiency

From a tax planning perspective, discretionary trusts allow the trustee to divide the income between the beneficiaries in the most tax-effective way each financial year. For example, for beneficiaries of the family trust who fall under a lower marginal tax rate, the trustee can distribute more income to them to reduce the overall tax paid by the family group.

This flexibility is particularly valuable for doctors with a spouse who earns less or who has taken time out of the workforce. Instead of rental income being taxed at your 47% marginal rate, it can be distributed to your partner at their lower rate — potentially 19% or 32.5% — creating immediate tax savings of 15–28 cents in every dollar.

On CGT, the trust structure is particularly powerful. Australian resident trusts, including discretionary trusts (family trusts), can indeed benefit from the 50% CGT discount, provided they meet certain requirements. A discretionary trust can distribute rental income and capital gains to beneficiaries in lower tax brackets, reducing the overall capital gains tax liability. For example, a property held in a family trust can have its capital gain distributed to beneficiaries who are students or retirees, taking advantage of their lower tax rates.

The treatment of capital gains has made trusts the vehicle of choice for holding capital-appreciating assets — precisely what strategic property investment aims to acquire.

The critical negative gearing trap: Any rental losses are "trapped" within the trust. They can't be distributed to beneficiaries to offset their personal salary income, but can be carried forward to offset future trust income or capital gains. This is the single most important trade-off a doctor must understand before choosing a trust over personal ownership for a negatively geared property.

For healthcare professionals, this means trusts work best for properties that are positively geared, neutrally geared, or approaching positive cash flow — not for properties with substantial ongoing losses.

Asset protection

Trusts provide asset protection, which is particularly useful in litigation or bankruptcy. The trust holds the property, not the individual beneficiaries, which can shield assets from creditors.

Assets owned by the trust are generally shielded from personal liability or legal action against the practitioner. If the doctor is sued or becomes bankrupt, the trust assets remain protected — because they are owned by the trust, not the individual.

In a profession where risk exposure and litigation are realities, trusts can offer a layer of protection by separating personal assets from practice assets or investments. Trusts allow for flexible income distribution, which can be a valuable tool in managing taxable income across family members or associated entities, sometimes reducing the overall tax burden.

This separation is critical for healthcare professionals. Even with comprehensive medical indemnity insurance, the possibility of an excess verdict or a claim that falls outside policy coverage means that asset protection must be proactive, not reactive.

The land tax warning

Trust structures carry a state-level land tax trap that many advisers underemphasise. The tax-free threshold does not apply to land owned as part of special or discretionary trusts. In New South Wales, for example, where the 2025 general threshold is $1,075,000 for individuals, many investors are advised to buy under a family trust to protect assets, split income, or manage estate planning. The problem is that in New South Wales, this can trigger major land tax liabilities that most investors don't anticipate. Doctors building multi-property portfolios in New South Wales or Victoria must model land tax exposure explicitly before committing to a trust structure.

This is where independent, conflict-free advice becomes essential. A buyer's agent or property adviser with no vested interest in the structure you choose can provide objective analysis of the total cost of ownership — including land tax — rather than simply promoting trust structures by default.

Verdict for doctors

The discretionary trust is the most versatile structure for established doctors with a partner or family members on lower incomes, a growing asset base that warrants protection, and properties that are positively geared or approaching neutral. It's not optimal as the primary vehicle for aggressively negatively geared properties unless the doctor is comfortable with the loss-trapping limitation.

For healthcare professionals in mid-career with growing wealth and family obligations, the discretionary trust represents the sweet spot of tax flexibility, asset protection, and long-term estate planning. It's particularly effective when combined with a clear property brief that targets assets with strong capital growth potential and manageable holding costs.

Structure 3: Company

How it works

A proprietary limited company is a separate legal entity. Having a company own your investment property means that any passive or rental income derived from that property will only be taxed at the company tax rate of 30%.

The company structure creates a legal separation between you and the asset, with the company itself owning the property. You control the company as director and shareholder, but the property isn't held in your personal name.

Tax efficiency

The company tax rate advantage is real but narrower than it appears. Companies don't benefit from the same negative gearing advantages available to individuals and trusts. This is because the company's income is taxed at a fixed rate rather than at personal income tax rates.

For a doctor earning $300,000+ annually, the 30% company tax rate appears attractive compared to the 47% personal marginal rate. However, this comparison overlooks the critical question: how does the after-tax income leave the company and reach you personally? Any dividends paid from the company to you as shareholder are added to your personal income and taxed at your marginal rate, with only a franking credit for the tax already paid by the company.

The CGT position is the company structure's most significant disadvantage for long-term property investment: capital gains on investments held by individuals are taxed at the individual's marginal tax rate, but they may be eligible for a 50% discount. Companies, on the other hand, are taxed at the full corporate rate of between 25–30% without access to any discounts.

To illustrate the impact: on a $500,000 capital gain from a property held for five years, an individual or trust beneficiary pays tax on $250,000 (after the 50% discount). A company pays tax on the full $500,000. At 30%, that's an additional $75,000 in tax — purely a function of the ownership structure.

For healthcare professionals pursuing strategic property investment for long-term wealth, this permanent loss of the CGT discount makes companies structurally unsuitable for residential property holdings.

Setting up and maintaining a company involves more administration and higher costs than other structures. This includes compliance with corporate governance requirements and additional legal obligations — an administrative burden that time-poor doctors should carefully consider.

Asset protection

Liability of shareholders is limited to the share capital they have subscribed, so the personal assets of shareholders can't be seized to pay company debts. However, company directors may still be liable for any debts, liabilities and legal actions held against their company. For doctors who are the sole director and shareholder, this protection is more limited than it appears.

In practice, lenders typically require personal guarantees from medical practitioners when lending to their companies, which further erodes the asset protection benefit. The theoretical separation between personal and corporate liability often collapses when examined through the lens of actual lending practices.

Verdict for doctors

A company structure is rarely optimal for residential property investment by doctors. The loss of the 50% CGT discount is a permanent and compounding disadvantage that typically outweighs the lower tax rate on rental income. Companies are better suited to property development or high-turnover activities where the CGT discount wouldn't apply anyway. For most doctor-investors, a discretionary trust with a corporate trustee achieves better asset protection and CGT outcomes simultaneously.

For healthcare professionals focused on building a residential property portfolio, the data is clear: company structures sacrifice too much in CGT efficiency to justify the modest rental income tax benefit. This is one area where independent, evidence-based advice consistently points away from a structure that may be promoted by advisers with commercial interests in company establishment fees.

Structure 4: Self-Managed Super Fund (SMSF)

How it works

An SMSF is a type of trust structure that operates under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act). Self-managed super funds must pay tax on their assessable income. A complying superannuation fund that follows the laws and rules for SMSFs qualifies for a concessional tax rate of 15%.

Property can be purchased inside an SMSF using a Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangement (LRBA), where if the SMSF defaults on loan repayments, the lender only has access to that particular property and nothing else held by the SMSF.

For healthcare professionals, SMSFs represent a highly tax-effective environment for property investment — but with significant constraints around accessibility and compliance that must be carefully weighed against the benefits.

Tax efficiency

The SMSF tax environment is the most concessional available to Australian investors — with one critical caveat about timing.

Accumulation phase: During this phase, the fund's net income — including investment income like dividends, interest, and rent — is generally taxed at a flat 15% rate. On capital gains, complying SMSFs are entitled to a capital gains tax discount of one-third if the relevant asset had been owned for at least 12 months. This produces an effective CGT rate of 10% — dramatically lower than the 23.5% effective rate for a high-income individual (47% × 50% discount).

For a doctor in the 47% tax bracket, the difference between 15% tax on rental income inside super versus 47% tax outside super is substantial. On $30,000 of annual rental income, that's a saving of $9,600 per year — compounding significantly over a decade or more.

Pension phase: If your SMSF is in retirement (pension) phase with segregated current pension assets, such gains are exempt current pension income and no CGT is payable. That means SMSFs can either be taxed, discounted, or completely exempt — depending on the phase of the fund and members' circumstances.

This zero-tax environment in pension phase is the most powerful wealth-building structure available to Australian investors. A property purchased for $600,000 and sold for $1.2 million after retirement attracts zero capital gains tax if held in an SMSF in pension phase — a tax saving of approximately $141,000 compared to personal ownership.

The Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) is currently set at $1.9 million (since 1 July 2023). This caps the amount that can be moved into the tax-free pension environment, but for many doctors who have been contributing through their peak earning years, this threshold is reachable and represents a clear target for long-term wealth accumulation.

Negative gearing inside super: Rental losses inside an SMSF can't be offset against personal income. They are quarantined within the fund and can only offset future fund income — the same limitation as a trust, but compounded by the fact that contributions into super are capped.

For healthcare professionals, this means SMSF property investment works best with assets that are positively geared or neutral from the outset, rather than properties requiring years of negative cash flow subsidy.

Asset protection

Generally, property investment held within an SMSF will be protected from creditors in the event of insolvency. So, as with a trust, SMSFs offer a good asset protection strategy.

For doctors facing professional liability risks, the SMSF provides robust separation between personal legal exposure and retirement assets. Even in the event of an excess verdict or personal bankruptcy, SMSF assets typically remain protected — provided the fund was established and funded appropriately in advance of any legal action.

This makes the SMSF particularly valuable for senior healthcare professionals and specialists in high-risk fields, where the combination of substantial super balances and elevated litigation risk creates a compelling case for protected, tax-advantaged property holdings.

Compliance costs and constraints

Managing an investment property held in an SMSF can be a complex and costly exercise. Beyond that, you can only access the funds in the SMSF when you retire or meet a condition of release.

Annual compliance costs for an SMSF typically range from $2,000 to $5,000, including accounting, audit, and administration fees. For healthcare professionals who are time-poor, the administrative burden of SMSF management — including trustee duties, regulatory reporting, and investment strategy documentation — must be factored into the decision.

This illiquidity is the SMSF's most significant practical constraint for doctors still in the wealth-building phase. A property held inside super can't be leveraged to fund the next acquisition outside super, can't be converted to a personal residence, and can't be sold to fund a business opportunity before retirement age.

For a detailed analysis of SMSF property rules, LRBAs, and compliance obligations, see our guide on Using an SMSF to Buy Investment Property: What Australian Doctors Need to Know.

Verdict for doctors

The SMSF structure is best suited to established consultants and specialists who have meaningful super balances (typically $400,000+), are within 10–20 years of retirement, and want to hold property in a low-tax environment with a clear pathway to the 0% pension phase CGT rate. It's not appropriate as a primary vehicle for junior doctors or those who need portfolio liquidity.

For healthcare professionals in mid-to-late career, the SMSF represents a powerful vehicle for tax-effective property investment — but only when the fundamentals align: adequate super balance, appropriate time horizon, and a property that fits within the fund's investment strategy and cash flow constraints.

Head-to-head comparison table

The medico liability context: why structure timing is non-negotiable

Most property investment guides treat structure selection as a tax question. For doctors, it's equally a liability management question — and the timing of the decision is critical.

Protection structures must be in place long before a threat arises to be respected. Courts examine intent and timing. A doctor who transfers property into a trust after a claim has been lodged, or after a significant adverse event, may find that the transfer is challenged as a fraudulent conveyance.

This is where the principle of proactive planning becomes essential for healthcare professionals. Asset protection isn't something you implement when a threat emerges — it's a framework you establish during the calm, strategic phase of wealth building, well before any potential legal action.

Trusts are one of the most effective asset protection strategies for doctors. They create a legal separation between you and your assets, making it harder for creditors to reach them. This separation is crucial for physicians who face above-average exposure to malpractice claims and regulatory actions.

The practical implication: the right time to establish a trust or SMSF structure is before the first investment property is purchased, not after a portfolio has been built in personal name. Restructuring an existing portfolio into a trust triggers CGT events and stamp duty — potentially eliminating years of accumulated gains in a single transaction.

For doctors who already hold property in personal name, the conversion question is complex (see our guide on Converting Your Home Into an Investment Property: A Tax and Finance Guide for Doctors). However, for any new acquisition, the structure decision should precede the purchase contract.

At 1Group Property Advisory, we work with healthcare professionals to integrate structure planning into your property brief from the outset. This ensures that every acquisition fits within a coherent, long-term wealth strategy — not a series of disconnected purchases that create structural problems down the track.

Financing implications of each structure

One dimension that receives insufficient attention is how structure affects borrowing capacity and access to medico-specific lending privileges.

Medico loan policies — including LMI waivers at 95% LVR and interest rate discounts — are available to eligible doctors borrowing in personal name. When borrowing through a trust or company, the lender typically assesses the application on commercial terms, often requiring a personal guarantee from the doctor and applying standard LMI thresholds. The medico premium largely disappears.

This creates a genuine tension for established doctors: the structure that maximises asset protection (trust) isn't the structure that maximises borrowing efficiency (personal name). The optimal approach for many doctors is to use personal name for early acquisitions where negative gearing and medico lending privileges deliver the greatest benefit, then transition to trust structures for subsequent properties as the portfolio matures and the tax profile shifts.

For healthcare professionals, understanding these trade-offs is essential to developing a coherent acquisition strategy. The first property might be purchased in personal name to maximise borrowing capacity and negative gearing benefits, whilst subsequent properties are acquired through a discretionary trust to protect accumulated wealth and optimise family tax outcomes.

This is precisely the type of strategic, evidence-based planning that distinguishes sophisticated property investors from those who simply accumulate assets without a clear framework. It's also why working with an independent buyer's agent — one who provides conflict-free advice without commercial interests in lending, structuring, or property sales — becomes invaluable for time-poor doctors.

For a detailed analysis of medico lending privileges, see our guide on Medico Home Loans Explained: LMI Waivers, 95% LVR, and Doctor-Only Lending Policies in Australia.

Integrating structure into your property brief

For healthcare professionals working with 1Group Property Advisory, the structure decision is integrated into your property brief from the first conversation. Your brief doesn't just specify location, price range, and property type — it also clarifies ownership structure, financing strategy, and tax objectives.

This integrated approach ensures that:

• Your acquisition strategy aligns with your structure — negatively geared properties are purchased in personal name where losses can be offset; positively geared or capital-growth assets are acquired through trusts where income splitting and asset protection deliver maximum value.

• Your financing is optimised for each structure — medico loan privileges are leveraged where available; trust borrowing is structured to minimise personal guarantees and maximise serviceability.

• Your due diligence includes structure-specific considerations — land tax exposure is modelled for trust purchases; SMSF compliance requirements are verified before contracts are exchanged.

• Your long-term wealth plan is coherent — each property fits within a staged strategy that evolves as your career progresses, income grows, and family circumstances change.

This is the difference between transactional property buying and strategic property investment. One focuses on the asset in isolation; the other integrates structure, tax, financing, and long-term objectives into a coherent framework designed to build sustainable wealth for healthcare professionals.

Key takeaways

• Personal name is optimal for negatively geared properties in the early career phase, where the 47% marginal rate amplifies tax deductions — but it offers minimal asset protection and becomes increasingly inadequate as professional liability risk and asset values grow.

• Discretionary trusts provide the strongest combination of tax flexibility and asset protection for established doctors, but rental losses are trapped within the trust and can't offset personal salary income — a critical trade-off for properties that are negatively geared.

• Companies are rarely the right structure for residential property investment by doctors: the permanent loss of the 50% CGT discount typically outweighs the lower corporate tax rate on rental income over any holding period beyond 5–7 years.

• SMSFs offer the most concessional tax environment (15% accumulation, 0% pension phase CGT) and strong creditor protection, but are constrained by contribution caps, illiquidity until retirement, and high compliance costs — making them appropriate only for doctors in the mid-to-late career phase with substantial super balances.

• Structure timing is non-negotiable: asset protection structures must be established before a legal threat arises, and restructuring an existing portfolio triggers CGT and stamp duty. The structure decision should precede the purchase contract, not follow it.

• Financing privileges vary by structure: medico loan benefits (LMI waivers, rate discounts) are typically available only for personal name borrowing, creating a strategic tension between borrowing efficiency and asset protection that requires careful planning.

• Land tax exposure differs significantly: trusts often lose access to tax-free thresholds in New South Wales and Victoria, making multi-property portfolios in trust structures potentially more expensive than anticipated.

For healthcare professionals, these aren't abstract principles — they're practical considerations that directly impact your wealth trajectory, risk exposure, and financial security. Getting the structure right from the beginning is as important as selecting the right property.

Conclusion

The four ownership structures available to Australian doctor-investors aren't interchangeable alternatives — they're tools suited to different career stages, income profiles, and risk contexts. No single structure is universally optimal. The most sophisticated approach is a layered strategy: personal name for early-career, negatively geared acquisitions that leverage medico lending privileges; discretionary trust for mid-career, income-producing assets where splitting distributions to a lower-income partner or family members delivers material tax savings; and SMSF for retirement-phase assets where the 0% CGT rate in pension phase creates a compelling long-term advantage.

What distinguishes a doctor's structural decision from that of other high-income investors is the professional liability overlay. The elevated and persistent risk of a claim that exceeds indemnity coverage means that asset protection can't be an afterthought — it must be the first filter applied to the structure decision, with tax optimisation layered on top.

For time-poor healthcare professionals, navigating these decisions requires access to independent, conflict-free advice grounded in data and evidence rather than commercial interests. The structure that maximises commissions for a property spruiker or mortgage broker may not be the structure that maximises long-term wealth for you.

1Group Property Advisory assists healthcare professionals throughout Australia in developing and implementing ownership structures that align with their career trajectory, risk profile, and long-term wealth objectives. Our role as an independent buyer's agent means we have no vested interest in which structure you choose — our focus is on what delivers the best outcome for your specific circumstances.

We integrate structure planning into your property brief from the outset, ensuring that every acquisition decision is informed by comprehensive due diligence, market research, and strategic analysis. From brief to settlement, we work alongside you to build a property portfolio that supports your journey towards financial independence — not just a collection of assets, but a coherent wealth-building strategy.

For guidance on how structure interacts with CGT timing strategies, see our guide on Capital Gains Tax Strategies for Doctor Property Investors in Australia. To understand how the portfolio-building journey evolves across career stages and which structures best support each phase, see Building a Property Portfolio as a Doctor: A Stage-by-Stage Roadmap from First Investment to Financial Independence.

References

• Australian Taxation Office. "CGT Discount." ATO.gov.au, 2024. https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/investments-and-assets/capital-gains-tax/cgt-discount

• Australian Taxation Office. "How SMSFs Are Taxed." ATO.gov.au, 2024. https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/super-for-individuals-and-families/self-managed-super-funds-smsf/smsf-administration-and-reporting/how-smsfs-are-taxed

• Australian Taxation Office. "Trust Capital Gains and Losses." ATO.gov.au, 2024. https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/trusts/trust-income-losses-and-capital-gains/trust-capital-gains-and-losses

• Australian Taxation Office. "Exempt Current Pension Income." ATO.gov.au, 2024. https://www.ato.gov.au/individuals-and-families/super-for-individuals-and-families/self-managed-super-funds-smsf/smsf-administration-and-reporting/exempt-current-pension-income

• Revenue NSW. "Land Tax Thresholds and Rates." Revenue.nsw.gov.au, 2025. https://www.revenue.nsw.gov.au/taxes-duties-levies-royalties/land-tax/understanding-land-tax/thresholds-and-rates

• Lockton Australia. "Medical Indemnity." global.lockton.com/au, 2025. https://global.lockton.com/au/en/products-services/medical-indemnity

• DPM Financial Services. "Different Types of Trusts for Doctors." dpm.com.au, 2025. https://www.dpm.com.au/knowledge-centre/different-types-of-trusts-for-doctors/

• William Buck Australia. "Discretionary Trusts and Tax Planning: Tips and Traps." williambuck.com, 2025. https://williambuck.com/news/em/general/discretionary-trusts/

• MEDIQ Financial Services. "Asset Protection for Doctors." mediqfinancial.com.au, 2024. https://www.mediqfinancial.com.au/blog/asset-protection-for-doctors/

• Canstar. "An Overview of Capital Gains Tax for SMSFs." canstar.com.au, 2025. https://www.canstar.com.au/superannuation/capital-gains-tax-smsfs/